[LUNI] file system limitations
Keith T. Garner
kgarner at kgarner.com
Mon Nov 18 10:47:01 CST 2002
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:51:57, scott thomason said:
> On Sunday 17 November 2002 05:36 pm, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm just not understanding the complexity of the objects,
> > but why not simply store the data members to the database and
> > rebuild them into an object at runtime in the wrapping language
> > around the SQL (PHP, C++, VB, Perl, whatever you're using)?
>
> Yuppers. I'd bet 5-1 that this is doable.
Just to toss out Java where it was ignored.... :) You've got a lot
of helper libraries that will persist the object into the database and
pull it back out. If its a huge enterprise type app, you could look
at EJB's....but for most smaller apps, you can probably get away with
Caster JDO[1] or Hibernate[2]
My boss has been playing with Hibernate for a project he's working on
Keith
[1] http://castor.exolab.org/
[2] http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/
--
Keith T. Garner kgarner at kgarner.com
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. --Bertrand Russell
More information about the luni
mailing list