[LUNI] file system limitations

Keith T. Garner kgarner at kgarner.com
Mon Nov 18 10:47:01 CST 2002


On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:51:57, scott thomason said:
> On Sunday 17 November 2002 05:36 pm, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm just not understanding the complexity of the objects,
> > but why not simply store the data members to the database and
> > rebuild them into an object at runtime in the wrapping language
> > around the SQL (PHP, C++, VB, Perl, whatever you're using)?
> 
> Yuppers. I'd bet 5-1 that this is doable.

Just to toss out Java where it was ignored....  :)  You've got a lot
of helper libraries that will persist the object into the database and
pull it back out.  If its a huge enterprise type app, you could look
at EJB's....but for most smaller apps, you can probably get away with
Caster JDO[1] or Hibernate[2]

My boss has been playing with Hibernate for a project he's working on

Keith

[1] http://castor.exolab.org/
[2] http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/

-- 
   Keith T. Garner                                        kgarner at kgarner.com
   The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
 certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.  --Bertrand Russell



More information about the luni mailing list