[LUNI] Using (Debian) Unstable packages in Woody

[Robert C. Ramsdell]

I tried the backport option, and am now happily using gnucash 1.8.x.  Next
the printer drivers...  

Martin, I did not consider the option of upgrading to unstable.  If the
backports work for me, I probably will stick with them.  One more question.
Is there a testing right now?  I was using woody when it was in the testing
stage and had few problems.

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Maney [mailto:maney at pobox.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:31 PM
To: Linux Users Of Northern Illinois - Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: [LUNI] Using (Debian) Unstable packages in Woody


On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:19:34PM -0500, Martin Maney wrote:
> > only available in Unstable.  Is anybody mixing unstable and woody on the
> > same machine, and if so, how has your experience been?  Any hints on how
to
> > go about it?
> 
> Backports, backports, backports.

I forgot the other option that I can (maybe) recommend: upgrade to
unstable and be done with it.

Unstable is usually quite usable for a workstation - I was running
Woody on this machine for over six months beofre it made it to release,
and had been tracking it on an experimental machine for at least three
or four months before that (which is how I became confident enough to
try it on my own desktop, of course).  It's mostly a lot of fun - you
get updated packages frequently, with only rarely any excitement when
something breaks annoyingly.

What I can't generate any enthusiasm for is trying to install binary
packages from unstable on a stable system.  *That* can take you to
places of library hell that even a Windows machine doesn't deserve.

-- 
To be alive, is that not to be
again and again surprised?  -- Nicholas van Rijn

______________________________________________________________________
Linux Users Of Northern Illinois - Technical Discussion 
luni at luni.org
http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni