[LUNI] OpenLDAP vs Fedora
Keith T. Garner
kgarner at kgarner.com
Fri Feb 2 10:06:53 CST 2007
Scott Lockwood wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:57 -0600, David Ehle wrote:
>
>> That said I've done installs of ldap auth twice now, once with openldap
>> and once with fedora directory server so if you run into trouble feel free
>> to drop me a message... though I'm far from a expert!
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> David
>
>
>
> I would really REALLY love to hear even an anecdotal comparison between
> the two.
>
I'll have something to report in the next few weeks. I'm doing it on a
small cluster of machines at work. I can tell you one thing,
Netscape/Fedora/Redhat/Whoever Directory Server is a lot easier to admin in
a lot of ways than OpenLDAP. I've used OpenLDAP for a long time, but it
just a pain in the pass on the admin side.
One feature I like for Fedora is that the ACL's are stored inside the
directory and updatable on the fly, unlike OpenLDAP.
Keith
--
Keith T. Garner kgarner at kgarner.com
"Make no little plans; they have no magic to
stir men's blood." - Daniel H. Burnham
More information about the luni
mailing list