[LUNI] OpenLDAP vs Fedora

Keith T. Garner kgarner at kgarner.com
Fri Feb 2 10:06:53 CST 2007


Scott Lockwood wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:57 -0600, David Ehle wrote:
> 
>> That said I've done installs of ldap auth twice now, once with openldap 
>> and once with fedora directory server so if you run into trouble feel free 
>> to drop me a message... though I'm far from a expert!
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> David
> 
> 
> 
> I would	 really REALLY love to hear even an anecdotal comparison between
> the two.
> 

I'll have something to report in the next few weeks.  I'm doing it on a
small cluster of machines at work.  I can tell you one thing,
Netscape/Fedora/Redhat/Whoever Directory Server is a lot easier to admin in
a lot of ways than OpenLDAP.  I've used OpenLDAP for a long time, but it
just a pain in the pass on the admin side.

One feature I like for Fedora is that the ACL's are stored inside the
directory and updatable on the fly, unlike OpenLDAP.

Keith

-- 
 Keith T. Garner                                        kgarner at kgarner.com
                "Make no little plans; they have no magic to
                   stir men's blood." - Daniel H. Burnham


More information about the luni mailing list